Link Above Discusses:
-Background
-The Differences between Bill C-51 and C-6
-Relevance to the Natural Health Community
-Summary of Points Discussed In This Paper
-The Property and Privacy Rights Affected by the Bill are Broad in Scope
-Context for the New Law - is it necessary to take away freedoms to protect us?
-The Hazardous Products Act
-The Criminal Code Criminal Negligence Provisions
-Civil Penalties
-The Abolition of the Law of Trespass
-The Right to Seize Property Without a Court Order, Without Reporting the Seizure to a Court, & for an Indefinite Period
-The Private Home Problem
-The State can Assume Control over Movement of Private Property Without Court Order & Without a Safety Concern
-The State can Assume Control of Private Property, Including Land, Without a Court Order & Without a Safety Concern
-The Move Away from the “Significant Risk” Test
-The Abolition of the Independent Review Board
-Are the Powers to Take Control of Businesses and to Seize Private Property for Alleged Contraventions Legal?
-The Creation of Administrative Offences
-We are Responsible for Costs of Seizures & Detentions Regardless of Whether the Seizures & Detentions were Justified
-Additional Costs and Responsibilities for Small Businesses
-Are many Consumers Products Banned?
-Orders to Test, Research and provide Documents with any indication of risk
-The Perpetual Documentation Burden
-The Reporting to the Minister Burden
-The disclosure of confidential business information
-Retailers and distributors become responsible for ensuring instructions and labelling are sufficient
-The Corporate shield is removed, Directors & Officers are liable for Company Offences even if they are not prosecuted
-Allowing Trade Agreements to become law without Parliamentary Oversight
